首页> 外文OA文献 >On automorphisms behind the Gitik -- Koepke model for violation of the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis w/o large cardinals
【2h】

On automorphisms behind the Gitik -- Koepke model for violation of the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis w/o large cardinals

机译:关于违反Gitik - Koepke模型背后的自同构   奇异的红衣主教假设没有大红衣主教

摘要

It is known that the assumption that ``GCH first fails at \aleph_{\omega}''leads to large cardinals in ZFC. Gitik and Koepke have demonstrated that thisis not so in ZF: namely there is a generic cardinal-preserving extension of L(or any universe of ZFC + GCH in which all ZF axioms hold, the axiom of choicefails, GCH holds for all cardinals \aleph_n, but there is a surjection fromPowerSet(\aleph_{\omega}) onto {\lambda}, where {\lambda} is any previouslychosen cardinal in L greater than \aleph_{\omega}, for instance, \aleph_{\omega+17}. In other words, in such an extension GCH holds in proper sense for allcardinals \aleph_n but fails at \aleph_{\omega} in Hartogs' sense. The goal ofthis note is to analyse the system of automorphisms involved in the Gitik --Koepke proof.
机译:众所周知,“ GCH首先在\ aleph _ {\ omega}失败”的假设导致ZFC中的大主教。 Gitik和Koepke证明了ZF中不是这样:即存在L(或ZFC + GCH的任何宇宙的通用基数保留扩展,其中所有ZF公理都持有,选择公理失败,GCH对于所有基数都持有\ aleph_n ,但是从PowerSet(\ aleph _ {\ omega})到{\ lambda}上有一个排斥,其中{\ lambda}是L中大于\ aleph _ {\ omega}的L中先前选择的基数,例如\ aleph _ {\ omega + 17}。换句话说,在这样的扩展中,GCH在所有主语\ aleph_n中都具有适当的含义,但在Hartogs的意义上却在\ aleph _ {\ omega}处失败,该注释的目的是分析Gitik中涉及的自同构系统- -Koepke证明。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kanovei, Vladimir;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号